I’m really not one to urge, suggest or be prone to settling problems by disobeying the law.
But I’m beginning to rethink that.
Perhaps the time to just say “SCREW YOU!” to Obama, Congress, SCOTUS and the rest of ‘em has come.
I mean hell, if the Negros can threaten us with “civil disobedience” because they don’t like Donald Trump, we can threaten them because we don’t like Obama and his methods of converting the United States into a cauldron of crap.
I began thinking this way when the increasingly rogue ‘government’ railroaded the bakers — you know, the bakers who refused to bake a cake for a pair of homos. And then fined them. For refusing to go against THEIR RELIGION.
When the bakers sued to have the case and decision thrown out, they unfortunately did so in a liberal jurisdiction where the deck was not stacked, but piled sky-high.
Muslim Obama’s stinking, biased, RAAACIST absurdly misnamed EEOC did that — the stupidly named Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Yeah, right — equal if you’re a fag, lesbo, Negro savage, Mexicano or as we’ll soon see, one of Muslim Obama’s precious MOOSLIMS.
The most recent travesty coming from Obama’s EEOC concerns a bunch of Muzzies who were hired to deliver beer (yes, I know, Muzzies don’t handle liquor). But nevertheless they took the jobs. And then they refused to go out on their routes because… you guessed it, they said that handling beer was “against their religion.”
Remember as we continue that that is exactly what the bakers did.
So the Muzzies, backed by Muslim Obama, sued. Or the EEOC did. For them.
The two Muslim truck drivers were Somali scum — Muslim Obama’s precious “refugees” — who claimed it was a violation of their religious beliefs even though Islam actually bars only the consumption of alcohol.
And then the stinking Somalis were awarded a stunning $240,000 — by a moronic liberal jury pretending to possess an IQ exceeding 13. The case stunned legal analysts by going forward at all.
Back to the bakers…
Do you see any difference between the Muzzies’ and the bakers’ claims? Neither do I.
So how come we saw opposite decisions in two virtually identical cases?
Well, the answer is obvious. We have a racist, biased, scumbag Muslim bastard running the country today, a Congress interested only in perpetuating its reelection to take
bribes err… I mean “political contributions” from lobbyists, judges voting whatever the hell they feel like voting instead of the law, and moronic liberals posing as humans sitting on juries.
Watch the video below in which the astoundingly stupid verdict is debated by Fox’s Meagan Kelley and Judge Andrew Napolitano.